Clubhouse #13 | Pacing Strategies for Endurance Events: Optimizing Race-Day Performance 🏃‍♂️🚴‍♀️🔥

In partnership with

One of the biggest factors that separate elite endurance athletes from the rest is their ability to pace correctly during long-distance events. Whether it’s a marathon, an Ironman, or an ultramarathon, mismanaging energy output can lead to early fatigue, energy crashes, and a disappointing finish. The best endurance athletes optimize pacing to maximize efficiency, ensuring that they finish strong while minimizing unnecessary energy expenditure.

In today’s Clubhouse, we’ll break down the science of pacing strategies, explore how to use different pacing models for various endurance events, and provide actionable methods to help you race smarter, prevent burnout, and achieve peak performance.

So lets dive in to learn how you can advance your recovery.

Read the past Clubhouses here:

• Clubhouse #12 | The Science of Muscle Recovery: How to Train Harder Without Burning Out 💪🛌🔥

• Clubhouse #11 | The Role of Carbohydrates vs. Fat in Endurance Performance 🥑

• Clubhouse #10 | The Science of Periodization: Structuring Training for Maximum Gains 🏋️

• Clubhouse #9 | Mastering Sleep: The Athlete's Guide to Leveraging Rest for Peak Performance 💤

• Clubhouse #8 | Lactate Threshold Training: Unlocking Peak Endurance Performance ⚡️

• Clubhouse #7 | AI in Fitness: How Technology is Shaping Personalized Health Plans 🔧

• Clubhouse #6 | Biohacking Sleep: Techniques for Optimal Rest and Recovery 💤

• Clubhouse #5 | The Connection Between Gut Health and Athletic Performance 🍎

• Clubhouse #4 | The Science-Backed Power of Visualization for Achieving Your 2025 Goals 🌟

• Clubhouse #3 | The science-backed reasons why sugar is good for athletes 🔋

• Clubhouse #2 | Why you should invest in a health tracking wearable like WHOOP

• Clubhouse #1 | How to actually train for your first Ironman 70.3.

The Science Behind Pacing: Why It’s Critical for Endurance Success

Energy Systems & Pacing

Endurance performance relies on efficient energy system management, particularly in the balance between glycogen (carbohydrates) and fat utilization. The body relies on glycogen as its primary energy source for high-intensity efforts, as it provides a quick and readily available fuel supply. However, glycogen stores are finite and can be depleted within 60-90 minutes of sustained intense exercise, depending on an athlete's metabolic efficiency and fueling strategy. When glycogen levels run low, the body experiences a sharp decline in performance, commonly referred to as “hitting the wall” or bonking, where power output and mental focus deteriorate rapidly.

To mitigate this, endurance athletes must employ effective pacing strategies that optimize fuel utilization. Starting a race too aggressively forces the body to rely heavily on glycogen, leading to premature depletion and a greater risk of metabolic failure. This is why pacing approaches such as negative splits—where an athlete begins at a conservative pace and gradually increases effort—are highly effective. By controlling early race intensity, the body can rely more on fat oxidation, a slower but virtually unlimited energy source, preserving glycogen for the final stages when a stronger effort is required.

Scientific studies on elite marathoners and Ironman competitors consistently show that those who maintain a steady, controlled effort throughout the race achieve better results than those who start fast and fade. Efficient pacing not only enhances endurance but also improves neuromuscular coordination, reduces lactate accumulation, and helps sustain mental clarity over long distances. Moreover, an athlete’s ability to regulate their energy systems effectively is one of the strongest predictors of race success, demonstrating why pacing is a crucial skill that must be developed in training and executed with precision on race day.

Common Pacing Strategies & When to Use Them

Even Pacing: The Key to Energy Efficiency

Even pacing is one of the most effective and widely used strategies in endurance racing, offering a measured and controlled approach to performance management. It involves maintaining a steady effort level from start to finish, ensuring that energy is distributed efficiently throughout the race. This strategy prevents premature glycogen depletion, allowing athletes to sustain performance over extended periods. By keeping a consistent speed and physiological workload, even pacing reduces fluctuations in heart rate and lactate accumulation, two primary contributors to early fatigue and performance decline.

Executing even pacing effectively requires a structured training plan that emphasizes steady-state efforts and endurance development. Athletes should integrate long, sustained workouts at goal race pace, reinforcing aerobic efficiency and muscular endurance. The use of training data, heart rate monitoring, and power meters can help refine this strategy, ensuring that an athlete remains within an optimal intensity range. Proper execution also involves maintaining a stable cadence, controlled breathing, and an even heart rate, all of which contribute to improved race efficiency.

This approach is particularly beneficial for long-distance events such as marathons, half-marathons, and Ironman races, where pacing errors can lead to significant performance drops in the later stages. Athletes who master even pacing avoid the common pitfall of starting too fast and fading—a mistake that often results in excessive lactate buildup, neuromuscular fatigue, and inefficient energy use. By adopting an even pacing strategy, endurance athletes can maximize their energy reserves, sustain mental focus, and execute a stronger finish.

Negative Splitting: Finishing Stronger Than You Start

Negative splitting is a pacing strategy that involves running the second half of a race faster than the first half. This approach is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways to optimize endurance performance, as it ensures gradual energy expenditure, prevents premature fatigue, and maximizes finishing speed. Elite marathoners, Ironman athletes, and track runners frequently adopt this strategy to achieve peak performance, as studies have shown that negative splits consistently lead to faster overall race times compared to starting fast and fading later.

Executing a negative split requires careful race planning and discipline. Athletes should begin their race at 5-10% below their goal race pace, which allows the body to efficiently warm up, regulate oxygen consumption, and rely more on fat oxidation in the early stages. This conservative start prevents excessive early glycogen depletion, ensuring that the muscles maintain energy reserves for a strong final push. As the race progresses, particularly after the halfway point, athletes can begin incrementally increasing their pace, shifting toward a higher intensity in the final third of the race. This gradual buildup prevents the performance drop-offs associated with early overexertion while allowing for an acceleration toward the finish line.

The physiological benefits of negative splitting are significant. By delaying glycogen depletion and managing lactate accumulation, this pacing method reduces perceived exertion early on, keeping athletes mentally engaged and physically prepared for the toughest part of the race. Additionally, it aligns well with neuromuscular efficiency, as the body’s ability to maintain running form and coordination improves when energy is distributed more evenly throughout the event.

Beyond the physiological advantages, negative splitting also has a strong psychological component. Athletes who pace conservatively at the start often experience a mental boost as they begin overtaking competitors in the latter half of the race. This surge in confidence and momentum can make a crucial difference in closing speed and overall race execution.

Endurance races, including marathons, Ironman events, and ultramarathons, see the most success with negative splits, as these races require sustained energy efficiency over long durations. Training for this approach involves long runs with progression pacing, where athletes practice finishing faster than they start, reinforcing both physiological adaptations and pacing awareness. By incorporating this strategy, endurance athletes can enhance race-day execution, delay fatigue, and finish stronger than they started, setting the foundation for optimal performance outcomes.

The Sleep App That Forbes Rated 5 Stars 😱

The app Forbes said helps "users achieve high-quality sleep by creating and maintaining effective sleep routines” is back with new sounds and features!

Now featuring over 300 unique sounds to fall asleep to, a personalized sleep tracker and more. It’s no wonder over 65 million people have downloaded this app for better sleep.

Try it tonight 👇

Get BetterSleep!

Positive Splitting: Why Starting Too Fast Fails

A positive split occurs when an athlete begins a race at an unsustainable pace and subsequently slows down due to fatigue. This is the most common mistake made by amateur endurance athletes, as the excitement of race day often leads to an overzealous start, where runners and cyclists push beyond their optimal effort levels too early. This initial burst of speed may feel effortless in the early miles or kilometers, but it often leads to a sharp decline in performance as the race progresses.

The dangers of positive splitting are well-documented. One of the most significant risks is early glycogen depletion, as the body burns through carbohydrate stores at an accelerated rate. Since glycogen is the primary energy source for endurance athletes, depleting it too soon can result in premature energy crashes, forcing the body to rely more heavily on fat oxidation—a much slower process for energy production. This shift causes a noticeable drop in power output and an increase in perceived effort, making it much harder to maintain race pace.

Additionally, excessive lactate accumulation becomes a serious issue when pacing is too aggressive at the start. Lactate is produced as a byproduct of anaerobic metabolism, and when it accumulates faster than the body can clear it, muscle fatigue and decreased neuromuscular coordination set in. This makes each subsequent stride or pedal stroke feel increasingly difficult, leading to a compounding effect of deteriorating mechanics and declining speed.

Beyond the physical toll, mental fatigue is another major factor in positive splitting. Athletes who go out too fast often experience a sense of defeat when they realize they cannot sustain their pace. This psychological burden leads to demotivation, loss of focus, and poor race execution, making it harder to push through discomfort in the later stages.

To avoid falling into this trap, athletes should prioritize discipline and patience in the opening miles. Developing a controlled start and sticking to pre-determined pacing strategies—such as negative splitting or even pacing—allows for more efficient energy distribution, reduced lactate accumulation, and better overall performance outcomes. Training sessions should include progression runs, controlled pace efforts, and simulated race conditions, reinforcing the importance of steady energy management and mental resilience. By staying committed to an optimal pacing strategy, athletes can maintain stronger biomechanics, improved endurance efficiency, and a powerful finish, ensuring that every ounce of energy is used effectively throughout the race.

Effort-Based Pacing: Adapting to Race Conditions

Effort-based pacing focuses on using heart rate zones and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) rather than pace per mile/kilometer, making it an invaluable strategy for endurance events with fluctuating terrain, temperature changes, or unpredictable environmental conditions. Unlike fixed pacing strategies, which rely on maintaining a consistent speed, effort-based pacing allows athletes to adjust their exertion levels dynamically, ensuring optimal energy conservation while preventing early fatigue. This method is particularly useful in trail races, hilly marathons, ultramarathons, and long-distance triathlons, where external factors such as elevation gain, wind resistance, and varying surface conditions can significantly impact speed.

To successfully implement effort-based pacing, athletes should target endurance-friendly heart rate zones (Zone 2-3) for the majority of the race, gradually transitioning to higher-intensity efforts as the event progresses. Heart rate monitoring ensures that athletes remain within an efficient aerobic range, preventing premature reliance on anaerobic metabolism, which leads to faster glycogen depletion. RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion) serves as an additional subjective guide, helping athletes tune into their body’s signals and maintain an intensity that is both sustainable and adaptable to real-time conditions. Ideally, athletes should start their race with an RPE of 6-7 out of 10, allowing for controlled energy expenditure, before gradually increasing effort to 8-9 in the final miles for a strong finish.

This pacing method not only helps maintain a more even energy output throughout the race but also enhances mental resilience and adaptability. By prioritizing effort over strict pace targets, athletes can adjust seamlessly to external factors such as steep inclines, adverse weather conditions, or technical trail sections. Moreover, effort-based pacing allows for better fueling efficiency, as maintaining a controlled intensity prevents excessive gastrointestinal distress, which is often exacerbated by sudden fluctuations in speed and effort.

By integrating this approach into training sessions—such as running by heart rate rather than pace, practicing progression runs, and adapting to different terrain conditions—athletes can develop the ability to fine-tune their exertion levels instinctively. This results in improved race execution, greater endurance efficiency, and a significantly reduced risk of energy crashes, ultimately leading to a more strategic and sustainable performance.

Conclusion

Pacing is one of the most critical factors in endurance success. The right strategy—whether even pacing, negative splits, or effort-based pacing—depends on the event, race conditions, and individual goals. By training your pacing strategy, you can optimize energy use, prevent burnout, and execute race day with precision.

The best endurance athletes don’t just push harder—they pace smarter.