Clubhouse #17 | Altitude Training: Can You Simulate It and Does It Actually Work? 🏔️

In partnership with

For decades, elite endurance athletes have traveled to high-altitude environments to train in thinner air. The promise? Improved oxygen delivery, elevated VO2 max, and a competitive edge when returning to sea level. But what exactly happens to your body at altitude—and can you replicate those adaptations without relocating to the mountains?

In this week’s Clubhouse, we explore the science behind altitude training, including how it impacts red blood cell production, aerobic capacity, and mitochondrial efficiency. We’ll also examine whether simulated altitude environments—like hypoxic tents or altitude masks—offer the same benefits, and when it makes sense to incorporate them into your training.

So why is altitude training so important?

Say goodbye to late-night SOAP charting and burnout

Doctors deserve better than endless charting. AiSOAP.com automates your SOAP notes, cutting documentation time by 95%. Let AI handle the paperwork, while you focus on patients.

⚡ Key Features of AiSOAP:

• 95% Less Documentation Time
  More time with patients, less time on paperwork.

• Fast, Accurate, and Reliable
  AI-generated notes in seconds with full customization.

• Secure and HIPAA-Compliant
  Your patient data is always safe and private.

• EHR-Friendly
  Easy integration with your existing tools.

Join 2,000+ clinicians reclaiming their time. Get $50 off with code: 🎟️ AISOAP50

🚀 Try AiSOAP Free Today

The Physiology of Altitude Training

When training or living at altitudes above 2,000 meters, the body enters a state of physiological stress due to the reduced partial pressure of oxygen. Although the volume of air inhaled remains constant, the oxygen content within that air is diminished, meaning that each breath delivers fewer molecules of oxygen to the lungs and subsequently into the bloodstream. This hypoxic environment forces the body to initiate a cascade of adaptations designed to maintain oxygen homeostasis, particularly in the face of sustained aerobic demand.

The most well-known and measurable adaptation is the upregulation of erythropoietin (EPO), a glycoprotein hormone produced primarily by the kidneys. In response to hypoxia, EPO levels rise rapidly, stimulating the bone marrow to increase production of red blood cells (RBCs). This leads to a higher hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration, both of which enhance the blood’s capacity to transport oxygen. Over time, this adaptation improves the oxygen delivery to working muscles, supporting greater endurance and work capacity, particularly at sea level where oxygen is abundant.

Beyond this hematological response, several key muscular and metabolic changes occur. At the cellular level, there is an increase in mitochondrial density and upregulation of oxidative enzymes, which improve the muscle’s ability to generate ATP through aerobic metabolism. Additionally, the body enhances capillary density—the network of small blood vessels supplying muscles—thereby improving the diffusion of oxygen and nutrients into cells while facilitating the removal of waste products like carbon dioxide and lactate.

A notable shift in energy system dominance also takes place. Hypoxic conditions push the body toward a greater reliance on aerobic metabolism, increasing fatigue resistance and improving the sustainability of effort. Athletes often exhibit an enhanced lactate threshold following altitude exposure due to improved lactate clearance mechanisms and a reduced reliance on anaerobic pathways during submaximal work.

Together, these adaptations lead to improvements in VO2 max, aerobic threshold, and time-to-exhaustion metrics. Athletes not only become more efficient in how they utilize oxygen but also more resilient under aerobic load. For this reason, elite endurance athletes routinely incorporate altitude training blocks into their periodized training plans, timing their descent to sea level to coincide with key competitions—thus exploiting the window of peak physiological benefit for optimal race-day performance.

Simulated Altitude: Does It Actually Work?

Thanks to advances in sports science, it is now possible to mimic high-altitude conditions using simulated hypoxic environments. These include hypoxic tents, altitude sleeping chambers, and specialized rooms or facilities that reduce the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to create a state of normobaric hypoxia—low oxygen without changes in atmospheric pressure.

The most widely studied and successful strategy is the "live high, train low" model, in which athletes sleep or rest in a hypoxic setting while completing high-quality training sessions at sea-level oxygen availability. This allows them to reap the hematological benefits of altitude while maintaining intensity in key workouts—a balance that is often difficult to achieve at natural altitude, where oxygen limitation can compromise training outputs.

This method has shown robust evidence in peer-reviewed literature, leading to improved VO2 max, endurance performance, and even competition results in some populations. However, outcomes vary based on individual responsiveness, duration of exposure, and hypoxic dose.

What About Altitude Masks?

Altitude masks, while popular, are often misunderstood. These devices restrict airflow, creating a sense of breathlessness that can make workouts more mentally and physically taxing. However, they do not reduce the oxygen concentration in the air, and therefore do not induce true hypoxic stress.

While altitude masks may provide some benefit by strengthening the respiratory muscles or promoting breathing control, they do not stimulate the same EPO response or hematological adaptations as genuine altitude exposure. As a result, they are better categorized as resistance breathing tools than altitude simulators.

Protocols: How to Use Altitude Training Effectively

Traditional Altitude Camps:

Attending a traditional altitude training camp remains one of the most time-tested methods for achieving hypoxia-induced adaptations. These camps are typically held at elevations between 2,000 and 2,500 meters—high enough to stimulate physiological changes without incurring the full risks of high-altitude exposure. Athletes usually begin to experience a measurable increase in erythropoietin (EPO) within 24–48 hours of arrival. Over the course of three to four weeks, this hormonal shift leads to a rise in red blood cell mass and hemoglobin concentration, significantly enhancing oxygen-carrying capacity and aerobic potential.

However, these adaptations do not come without trade-offs. Due to reduced oxygen availability, athletes may find it difficult to maintain the same intensity in high-effort training sessions. To accommodate this, training at altitude typically shifts toward aerobic base work, technique refinement, and submaximal efforts, allowing for volume accumulation without excessive fatigue. Coaches often reduce the frequency or intensity of interval work and emphasize recovery between sessions to prevent overreaching.

After the camp, athletes return to sea level and enter a critical supercompensation window, usually lasting one to three weeks. During this phase, the enhanced red blood cell volume, along with restored training intensity, leads to peak performance. Athletes often time races or testing blocks during this window to capitalize on the gains made at altitude.

Simulated Altitude Strategies:

For those without access to mountain environments, simulated altitude strategies offer a practical alternative. These involve the use of hypoxic tents, altitude sleeping chambers, or normobaric hypoxic rooms, which lower the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to replicate high-altitude conditions. Athletes typically spend between 8 and 12 hours per day in these environments, most commonly while sleeping.

The success of these strategies hinges on a few key variables:

• Hypoxic dose: This refers to the cumulative exposure—calculated by multiplying hours per day by the number of days—and is critical for driving adaptation.

• FiO2 level: Generally set between 13% and 15%, mimicking altitudes of 2,000–3,000 meters.

• Total duration: Most protocols run for at least 2–3 weeks to allow sufficient time for hematological changes to manifest.

Unlike natural altitude camps, simulated strategies allow athletes to complete their daily training sessions in normoxic (sea-level oxygen) conditions. This preserves training quality, particularly for high-intensity efforts like threshold work or VO2 max intervals. By decoupling the living and training environments—living high and training low—athletes can optimize both physiological stress and mechanical output.

That said, simulated protocols require consistency and discipline. Spending sufficient time in the hypoxic environment each day is essential to elicit a response. Athletes should also be mindful of recovery, iron levels, and hydration, just as they would at a traditional camp.

When implemented correctly, both traditional and simulated altitude strategies can deliver measurable improvements in oxygen transport, aerobic efficiency, and endurance performance. The choice between them often comes down to logistical feasibility, access, and the athlete’s individual response to hypoxic stress.

Who Benefits Most?

Altitude training can be a game-changing intervention for a wide range of athletes, particularly those whose sports demand prolonged aerobic output, efficient energy use, and resistance to fatigue. Endurance athletes—such as marathoners, triathletes, cyclists, and cross-country skiers—stand to gain the most, as the improvements in oxygen transport and VO2 max directly translate to enhanced performance over long distances. By boosting red blood cell mass and improving oxygen utilization, these athletes can sustain higher intensities for longer periods with less physiological strain.

Team sport athletes also benefit, particularly during off-season or preseason phases. Sports like football, rugby, and soccer rely on intermittent high-intensity efforts interspersed with active recovery. Building a stronger aerobic base through hypoxic adaptation allows players to recover more quickly between sprints and maintain output late into games. Additionally, better aerobic conditioning supports repeat sprint ability and resilience under fatigue.

Combat sports and weight-class athletes, such as boxers, MMA fighters, and wrestlers, may incorporate simulated altitude environments for both performance and weight management purposes. Hypoxia-induced appetite suppression and increased metabolic rate can assist in cutting weight, while the cardiovascular and hematological benefits support conditioning in the lead-up to competition.

Athletes preparing for high-altitude races—like mountain trail runs, alpine cycling stages, or ski touring events—also rely heavily on altitude training. Acclimatizing beforehand is not only a performance advantage but also a safety precaution against altitude sickness and hypoxic fatigue.

However, not every athlete experiences equal benefit. Some individuals are classified as non-responders, showing minimal hematological changes despite similar hypoxic exposure. This variability can be attributed to several factors, including iron status, genetic predisposition, hormonal profile, and baseline training adaptation. For instance, athletes with low ferritin levels may not respond well because iron is essential for hemoglobin synthesis. Without adequate iron stores, even elevated EPO levels may not translate into increased red blood cell production.

To maximize effectiveness, athletes should undergo regular blood testing, including ferritin, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels, both before and during altitude interventions. This helps monitor responsiveness and allows for timely nutritional or training adjustments. Supplementation, especially with iron, should be undertaken cautiously and under medical supervision.

Ultimately, altitude training is a powerful tool—but like any intervention, it must be individualized, data-informed, and integrated into a larger performance strategy to deliver its full potential.

Risks and Considerations

While altitude training has been shown to enhance endurance performance and physiological efficiency, it is not without potential drawbacks—particularly when poorly planned or executed. One of the most immediate concerns is a reduction in training quality. At higher elevations, the reduced oxygen availability can significantly impair an athlete’s ability to perform high-intensity sessions. This decline in intensity can lead to a decrease in neuromuscular engagement and power output, which, over time, may blunt anaerobic conditioning or race-specific adaptations if not counterbalanced with appropriate sea-level work.

Moreover, fatigue accumulation is a common issue for athletes undergoing prolonged hypoxic exposure. The physiological stress of living in a low-oxygen environment taxes the cardiovascular, metabolic, and endocrine systems, often resulting in elevated fatigue levels, disrupted sleep, and compromised recovery. If this cumulative stress is not adequately managed, it can lead to overreaching or, in severe cases, full-blown overtraining syndrome.

Another key consideration is the impact on the immune system. Immune suppression has been observed with extended altitude exposure, potentially increasing an athlete’s vulnerability to illness or infection. This is particularly relevant during multi-week camps or simulated altitude blocks, where inflammation and nutrient demands are heightened.

Additionally, athletes unaccustomed to altitude may suffer from altitude sickness, especially at elevations above 2,500 meters. Symptoms such as headaches, nausea, appetite loss, and insomnia are not uncommon in the early days of exposure and can limit an athlete’s ability to train, eat, or recover effectively.

To mitigate these risks, a personalized and progressive altitude strategy is essential. This includes proper pre-camp screening (e.g., ferritin and hemoglobin levels), periodized training loads, emphasis on nutrition and hydration, and ongoing monitoring of biomarkers and recovery status. Altitude training can be a powerful performance enhancer—but only when approached with precision, patience, and expert oversight.

Conclusion

Altitude training remains one of the most powerful and natural performance-enhancement tools available to endurance athletes. Whether you’re training at a high-altitude location or using a hypoxic tent in your bedroom, the goal is the same: to stress your oxygen transport system in a way that drives long-term physiological improvements.

When applied with proper planning, altitude training can deliver tangible gains in red blood cell mass, VO2 max, mitochondrial efficiency, and muscular endurance. Yet it is not a shortcut—it demands attention to recovery, iron status, load management, and personalized programming.

Simulated methods like “live high, train low” have made altitude training more accessible, but like any performance tool, it must be implemented strategically. If done right, you’ll return to sea level with an unfair advantage—ready to push harder, last longer, and go faster.

P.S.: Found this useful? Forward it to a teammate prepping for their next big race or someone curious about taking their training to new heights. 🏔️💨

Train high, race low,

Robert